California, West Coast states roll out their vaccine recommendations

Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a law Wednesday giving California the power to set its own immunization schedules based on state health experts and independent medical groups — a sharp break from decades of reliance on guidance from the federal government.

The move came the same day that California and its West Coast allies issued joint recommendations for COVID-19, flu and RSV vaccines, part of a regional alliance formed to counter what they say is a politicized U.S. Centers for Disease Control.

“Our states are united in putting science, safety, and transparency first — and in protecting families with clear, credible vaccine guidance,” said the governors of California, Oregon, Washington and Hawaii, which make up the West Coast Health Alliance.

The healthcare clash comes following a wave of COVID cases and as the annual flu season nears. For decades, the CDC has been the nation’s trusted authority on vaccines — setting childhood immunization schedules, guiding which shots adults should receive and shaping state health policies across the country.

But at the direction of Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a Trump ally, the CDC fired top leadership, lost senior scientific advisors and remade its vaccine advisory committee with members who the Associated Press found spread misinformation and conspiracy theories about immunizations. That committee, Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, is set to meet Thursday and Friday to review — and potentially change — vaccine recommendations.

Kennedy, a longtime vaccine skeptic, has defended the shakeup as necessary to create trust and “eliminate politics from science.”

“They deserve the truth and that’s what we’re going to give them for the first time in the history of the agency,” Kennedy told the Senate Finance Committee earlier this month during a contentious hearing.

Fired CDC chief Susan Monarez told U.S. senators on Wednesday that the United States public health system is headed to a “very dangerous place” under Kennedy and that she had been unsuccessfully pressured to sign off on new vaccine recommendations without supporting scientific data.

The chaos at the CDC triggered a fierce backlash as more than 1,000 employees at the health agency and national health organizations have called on Kennedy to resign. Some states, however, have embraced the approach — Florida announced plans to become the first state to end all mandated vaccines, including for schoolchildren.

The polarization is taking a toll. A recent KFF poll found Americans are increasingly uncertain about public health guidance and whether new recommendations from the administration will make them more or less safe.

Public health experts say that not only are vaccines crucial for the health of individuals and the community but they also ultimately save money — preventing sickness and the rise in healthcare costs that would accompany widespread disease outbreaks.

The changes in federal vaccine recommendations have been sweeping. The Food and Drug Administration, which falls under Kennedy’s purview, now requires adults 65 and younger and otherwise healthy — who report no underlying health issues — to consult with a healthcare provider before getting the COVID vaccine. Similarly, the CDC requires parents of healthy children to talk to a healthcare provider before their child can receive the COVID vaccine, a barrier the American Academy of Pediatrics called “deeply troubling.”

The American Academy of Pediatrics issued its own COVID vaccine guidance, countering what the CDC recommended, that says all young children 6 months to 23 months should be vaccinated, as well as certain high-risk older children. The group said that older children should be offered the vaccine if their parents request it.

The CDC also changed its vaccine schedule from recommending the COVID vaccine to all pregnant women to offering “no guidance” as to whether healthy pregnant women should get the vaccine. In response, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommended that people receive the updated COVID-19 vaccine at any point during their pregnancy.

California said it too will reject CDC guidance, starting with the recommendations released Wednesday from the West Coast Health Alliance. Those recommendations were developed by health officers and subject matter experts from each state, who considered guidelines from medical organizations such as the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the American Academy of Family Physicians.

The COVID-19 vaccine recommendations from the West Coast Health Alliance include vaccinating all children 6 months to 23 months, all seniors 65 and older and anyone 2 years old to 64 years old with risk factors. The alliance recommended all pregnant and postpartum women or those planning to become pregnant to be vaccinated.

The alliance recommended people get vaccinated if they are in close contact with other people who have risk factors for severe illness if they get COVID-19. It was also recommended all children who have never been vaccinated against COVID-19 get a shot.

Those recommendations are slightly different for adults issued from the American Academy of Family Physicians, which recommends all adults get the updated COVID vaccine.

The alliance recommended that children 6 months and older and all adults and pregnant women receive the flu shot. For the RSV vaccine, the alliance recommends it for children younger than 8 months, as well as anyone 75 years or older. The alliance recommends the RSV vaccine for people age 50 to 74 if a person has risk factors and for pregnant women between 32 weeks and 36 weeks of gestation.

Jake Scott, an infectious disease physician and clinical associate professor at Stanford School of Medicine, said the recommendations from the West Coast Health Alliance sends a clear message to residents that their state governments “will not allow them to become victims of federal scientific incompetence.”

“It tells families that when they ask their doctors about vaccines for their children, those recommendations will still be based on decades of rigorous research and clinical evidence, not on whatever political winds are blowing in Washington,” Scott said.

With Newsom’s signature on Assembly Bill 144, the state overhauled its law that referenced the CDC’s current recommendations as the basis for which immunizations are covered by health insurance. Those recommendations will now be made by a larger group of medical associations and the national vaccine advisory committee’s guidance as of Jan. 1, 2025 — which was prior to Kennedy‘s being sworn in.

The new law allows the California Department of Public Health to modify or expand the list of recommended immunizations with input from medical and scientific organizations. It also extends liability protections for any vaccine injury caused by “omission in prescribing, dispensing, ordering, furnishing, or in the administration of a vaccine or other immunizing agents” for any shots required by state law or done in accordance to the state’s recommendations. That liability waiver, which would be in effect until 2030, does not include willful misconduct or gross negligence.

“We want the people who live and work in our states to know that there is a strong public health, healthcare and scientific community that will continue to stand together to provide and use the data and evidence needed for you to make healthy choices, and we are here to protect our communities,” said Dr. Erica Pan, director of the California Department of Public Health, in a statement.

The flurry of vaccine actions came as lawmakers and the University of California proposed a $23-billion ballot measure to replace federal research dollars lost to Trump-era cuts, underscoring efforts by Democrats in the state to shield science and public health from shifting federal policies. Senate Bill 607, if passed by the California Legislature when lawmakers return in January, would go before voters in November 2026.

At UCLA, the Trump administration has suspended more than half a billion dollars in research grants and demanded the university pay a $1.2-billion fine over allegations of antisemitism and civil rights violations.

“The loss of critical federal funding awarded to the University of California presents an unprecedented and perilous moment for the state and its communities,” Theresa Maldonado, UC vice president for research and innovation, said in a statement.

Times staff writer Rong-Gong Lin contributed to this report.


Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *