After His Lawsuit Was Dismissed, Blake Lively Has Filed A Motion Arguing That Justin Baldoni Owes Her A Looooot Of Money

Blake Lively is seeking millions from Justin Baldoni over his “baseless” lawsuit against her, and one of the declarations her team has provided is likely of interest.

Bryan Bedder / Getty Images for Vital Voices Global Partnership, Sean Zanni / WireImage

The general gist of the legal drama thus far is that in December 2024, Blake filed a California Civil Rights Department complaint against Justin, her It Ends With Us costar and director, who she then went on to sue. She alleged that Justin and his colleagues (“The Wayfarer parties”) engaged in sexual harassment and a subsequent retaliatory smear campaign. Justin then sued her in response, alleging, among other things, defamation for her claims.

Two people walking on a sidewalk at night. The person on the right is wearing a long skirt, knee-high boots, and a loose shirt tied at the waist — Jose Perez/Bauer-Griffin / GC Images

Related: Just 24 Of The Wildest Looks In VMAs History

Then, in June of this year, Justin’s countersuit was dismissed. The judge ruled that Blake’s sexual harassment claims against him constituted “privileged” speech under California law. Basically, California has a rule that you can’t be sued for defamation if you make a serious allegation of sexual harassment. It’s designed to protect victims from being further abused by the legal system, such as a scenario where someone might keep quiet due to fears of never-ending legal fees.

Person in a sweater and trousers on a red carpet, posing at a Variety event backdrop — Araya Doheny / Variety via Getty Images

It’s California Civil Code Section 47.1, for the law nerds out there.

Yesterday, Blake’s lawyers filed a motion arguing that, as Justin’s countersuit was dismissed, she counts as a “prevailing defendant” under the California code and is entitled to a lot of money. Specifically, the attorneys’ fees and costs she incurred while defending herself from the countersuits, “treble damages for the harm” caused for the “retaliatory ‘defamatory action,'” and “punitive damages” to deter similar behavior in the future.

Nicole Rivelli / Sony Pictures Releasing /Courtesy Everett Collection

Related: 21 Celebrity Facts That Are, Like, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really Shocking

Her team argues, “The Wayfarer Parties’ defamation action against Blake Lively was baseless from the start. Despite repeated warnings about the impropriety of their legal claims, and the consequences of continuing to pursue them, the Wayfarer Parties refused to back down. Instead, they stoked the flames of public sentiment, posting their retaliatory lawsuit on a public website alongside dozens of heavily redacted and context-free exhibits masquerading as ‘receipts,’ to flood the zone with vicious character attacks on Ms. Lively designed to damage her credibility and to conceal their own unlawful acts.”

Director's chair with "Justin Baldoni" on it, seen at a celebrity event — Jose Perez/Bauer-Griffin / GC Images

Related: “All We Did Was Look In His Direction”: People Are Opening Up About The Worst Celebs They’ve Ever Encountered, And I Did NOT Expect To See Some Of These Names

They then provided a signed declaration in support of their motion. It is signed by someone who alleges, “I had repeated, negative interactions with Mr. Baldoni and his associates, including verbal abuse by Mr. Baldoni…[Redacted] Mr. Baldoni not be permitted on set during the majority of production as a result of those experiences.”

Individual on a red carpet wearing a stylish pastel suit with a white top and an accessory on the lapel — John Nacion / Variety via Getty Images

The declaration continues, “I requested that he not be involved in [redacted] marketing or public relations efforts.” They then provide alleged evidence, which is currently under seal. A source close to the case told BuzzFeed that the declarant is likely to testify in the trial.

Two people conversing outside; one wears a yellow jacket and patterned pants, the other a dark coat and sneakers. Background figure in colorful attire — Gotham / GC Images

Related: From Florence Pugh To Zoë Kravitz, Here’s All The Celebrities Who Rocked Sheer Or Naked Dresses

In reference to the motion for attorney’s fees, a spokesperson for Blake told BuzzFeed, “California law expressly prohibits suing victims who speak out against sexual harassment or retaliation, whether in court or in the press. The statute also includes a mandatory fee-shifting provision, requiring those who file frivolous defamation claims to pay damages. The Wayfarer Parties’ failed plan to sue Blake Lively ‘into oblivion’ has only created greater liability for them, and rightly so. Sadly, Ms. Lively is not alone in facing a retaliatory defamation suit after speaking out about harassment at work. That is precisely why California enacted AB 933: to make clear that survivors are protected when they speak up, and that those who weaponize the legal system to silence them will be held accountable, not just for attorneys’ fees, but for treble damages and punitive damages as well.”